• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sealing & Contamination Control Tips

Fluid Power Sealing and Contamination Control Information and Resources

  • News
  • Contamination Control
  • Filtration
  • Seals
  • Fluids
  • Design Guides
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Featured / The benefits of unitized sealing products in hydraulic cylinders

The benefits of unitized sealing products in hydraulic cylinders

August 14, 2024 By Mary Gannon

Share

Unitized sealing solutions feature over-molding and precision machining to eliminate challenges inherent in standard piston and gland designs.

Contributed by Andrew Iddeson, Product Technology Director, Advanced Sealing Technologies and Chuck White, Global Product Development Manager

Hydraulic cylinders are a key component in efficiently harnessing the power created by a fluid power system into usable linear motion. This motion is used in many applications, enabling various modes of operation. From excavation to lifting operations, hydraulic cylinders play a key role in a wide range of equipment found in the market today.

The recent drive for more sustainable solutions means that demand for cylinders to perform in harsher conditions is growing, challenging cylinder manufacturers to rethink common designs. The sealing system is a critical element of a hydraulic cylinder. Although seals usually make up less than 5% of the cost to manufacture the cylinder, they are essential.

Hydraulic cylinder seals are typically manufactured in high-grade thermoplastic polyurethane and other thermoplastic elastomers, which range in shore hardness between 90A and 72D.

The seals must be flexible enough to respond to changing pressure, maintaining seal function, which results in movement of the cylinder, and yet durable enough to minimize wear and creep over long periods of time. Several challenges can threaten the system’s performance. Let’s explore three of the most common challenges in more detail.

A comparison between traditional gland seals and unitized sealing designs. Image courtesy of Hallite
A comparison between traditional gland seals and unitized sealing designs. Image courtesy of Hallite

Common performance challenges
Extrusion gap: Extrusion is one of the leading causes of reduced seal performance or failure. Extrusion occurs when the system pressure forces the seal material into the gap that exists between the dynamic surface being sealed and the clearance diameter of the gland or piston. The extrusion gap is created due to the machine tolerances of the various components, resulting in a “least material condition” (LMC) and a “maximum material condition” (MMC). If the LMC is too large, this could result in an unacceptable extrusion gap, allowing the seal material to deform into the area when under pressure. If the MMC is too small, this could potentially result in metal-to-metal contact between the dynamic and static components of the cylinder.

Coaxial Alignment: All sealing systems require some level of guidance to ensure the seals are not biased to one side or crushed under heavy side load conditions. This is typically achieved using wear bands that are installed near the seal in a machined groove. To accommodate these grooves, the hardware (e.g., piston or gland) requires sufficient length to accommodate these wear bands, resulting in heavy components and a high cost of raw materials. Also, the wear bands and the grooves have tolerances, which add to the LMC and MMC stacks that we described earlier on. Also, consideration must be given to the compressibility of the material being used for the wear bands to ensure that metal-to-metal contact does not occur. The compressing strain is also to be considered in the LMC and MMC calculations making it even more challenging.

Side loading: As mentioned, the hydraulic cylinder industry is seeing an increased demand for harder-working cylinders in certain applications, such as excavation. When the system works, any side load created in the cylinder begins to challenge the wear bands due to the loss of straight-line operation. Extreme side loading may result in failure of the wear bands, allowing metal-to-metal contact to occur. Operating seals with a lateral bias can cause uneven seal wear, resulting in premature failure over time. Highly engineered wear band materials may mitigate some of the effects of side loading but tend to be expensive and are not always 100% effective.

An innovative complete solution
The unitized piston and gland solution addresses all the challenges discussed. It offers an innovative approach of over-molding the product and then, by precision machining the wear material, eliminates the sealing challenges inherent in standard piston and gland designs.

To address the extrusion gap, a unitized sealing solution is over-molded and then precision machined to the desired OD (piston) or ID (gland). By doing this, the LMC and MMC are minimized as the tolerances of the wear band grooves are no longer a factor. The precision of the machined bearing results in up to 70% reduction in the extrusion gap compared to typical configurations with separate bearings. This results in longer seal life and the ability of the seal to resist higher operating pressures. Since the unitized products’ introduction, many customers have benefited. Here are two cases.

Comparison between traditional piston sealing and unitized sealing designs. Image courtesy of Hallite.
Comparison between traditional piston sealing and unitized sealing designs. Image courtesy of Hallite.

Case A: A customer faced challenges in high-pressure environments, struggling to reduce the extrusion gap sufficiently for the seals to function effectively. The extrusion gap was narrowed to a mere 0.004 in. at the “least material condition” (LMC), enabling the seals to withstand pressures exceeding 10,000 psi. This significant improvement not only eradicated seal-related warranty claims but also substantially prolonged the operational lifespan of the cylinders in their demanding applications.

Case B – Due to an excessive extrusion gap in the design, a customer was using a high-cost, four-piece piston seal with anti-extrusion rings. The unitized sealing solution provided the advantage of a compact two-piece piston seal, reducing the cost while also reducing the length of the piston, resulting in less material and increasing the stroke length of the cylinder by 1.5 in. Ultimately, these changes culminated in improved performance and longer cylinder life in the application.

With a smaller extrusion gap, there is also an improvement in coaxial alignment. The standard piston could see upwards of 0.010 in. movement side to side from the center line of the rod or piston, while the unitized product will see a maximum of 0.003 in. side-to-side movement. This keeps the wear on the seal package equal by not allowing the piston or the rod to continually bias one side which is especially important in horizontal operating applications. The following customer cases put this in perspective.

Case C – A cylinder operating in a horizontal plane was experiencing seal failures due to uneven wear on the rod seal, resulting in premature leakage. The customer was using ductile iron for the gland, but it could not achieve a tight enough tolerance to counter the leak. The unitized gland corrected the issue by improving the alignment of the rod, which prevented uneven wear on the rod seal and improved its life.

Case D – A high level of dirt ingression was getting past a customer’s rod wiper. The cylinder operated in an environment with high levels of airborne dirt and sand, which, once inside the cylinder, would embed in the rod and piston seals. A review of the cylinder and application revealed that a lack of coaxial alignment allowed the rod to bias to one side, reducing the preload of the rod wiper to less than 1%. The unitized piston and gland combination corrected the coaxial alignment. Also, it provided a barrier with over-molded wear surfaces that trap any contamination before infiltrating the seal package.

Finally, with the unitized sealing design, it is possible to increase the bearing surface of the wear band as it covers a much larger part area. In the case described below, over-molding the surface versus using wear bands increases the overall bearing surface by 72%, whereas over-molding a gland would increase the bearing surface by 147%. Because of the significant increase in bearing surface and the fact that metal is no longer exposed, it is now possible to evaluate shortening both the piston and gland while still having more bearing surface. The customer case illustrates how the piston can be shortened by 0.500 in. and still have a bearing surface that is 22% greater than the original piston. The rod gland can be shortened by 0.880 in. and maintain a bearing surface that is 46% greater than the original gland.

Case E – A customer using cylinders in a loader application reported seal failures and metal-to-metal contact. Improper use of the equipment meant that instead of using the loader to lift and dump media, the customer was inverting the bucket down and using it as a scraper to level hard surfaces, resulting in high-frequency shock on the seal package and excessive side loading to the rod and piston. In some cases, this load was so high that metal-to-metal contact began to damage the cylinder. The unitized piston and gland eliminated the metal-to-metal contact, protecting all metal surfaces. Also, the reduced extrusion gap protected the seals from the high-frequency shock load, delivering improved cylinder performance and longevity of the seal package.

Additional benefits underscored by sustainability
Using the unitized sealing solution in a cylinder system can reduce the piston and rod gland lengths, reducing the material required to produce them and the cost.

With shorter pistons and glands, the same stroke length may be achieved with a shorter tube rod combination, resulting in less material and reduced cost. The reduction in length can also be used to maximize the stroke length of the hydraulic cylinder, which may improve performance in the application.

Another advantage is that the unitized solution is delivered to the customer fully assembled, with the seal package ready to assemble to the cylinder. This speeds up the assembly and production process and reduces inventory space.

Finally, the unitized solution contributes to a more sustainable hydraulic cylinder system. By reducing the weight of these components, less energy is required from the fluid power system, and less weight is carried on mobile hydraulic equipment. They also solve the challenges presented by extrusion gap, coaxial alignment, and side loading, protecting the sealing system and significantly increasing its longevity. Metal and some bearing materials utilize recycled products and can also be recycled at the end of their lives.

In summary, unitized pistons and glands benefit hydraulic cylinders by increasing their longevity while protecting the seal package. These products represent a sustainable solution due to their impact on the longevity of the overall cylinder and the ability to address more aggressive operating conditions. They require less energy to operate because they are lighter in weight than a standard solution, which means they require less power from the fluid power system. Lastly, there are clear cost savings to the customer due to the requirement of less steel and a significant impact on reducing the cylinder production process time by installing a fully machined and assembled part.

Hallite
hallite.com

You might also like

Filed Under: Featured, Seals Tagged With: hallite

Primary Sidebar

Fluid Power World Digital Editions

Fluid Power World Digital Edition

Browse the most current issue of Fluid Power World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading design engineering magazine today.

Fluid Power Design Guides

fluid
“sact
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Fluid Power Professionals.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • October 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Archives

  • October 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

Sealing and Contamination Tips

Fluid Power World Digital Network

  • Fluid Power World
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Pneumatic Tips
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Leadership in Engineering

Sealing & Contamination Control

  • Subscribe to Fluid Power World
  • Videos
  • Advertise with us
  • About us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly, LLC · Privacy Policy