• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sealing & Contamination Control Tips

Fluid Power Sealing and Contamination Control Information and Resources

  • News
  • Contamination Control
  • Filtration
  • Seals
  • Fluids
  • Design Guides
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Featured / How do you remove water from hydraulic fluid?

How do you remove water from hydraulic fluid?

October 17, 2016 By Paul Heney Leave a Comment

Share

Various types of contamination occur in fluid power systems: gaseous (e.g. air), liquid (e.g. water) and solid contaminants. Focusing on water, this type of contamination can be caused by moisture from ambient air, leakage of cooling systems or process water, leakage of seals and chemical processes such as combustion, oxidation and neutralization.

“Water can be present in a dissolved state and a free state (when the saturation point of the fluid has been surpassed),” explained Dan Zoller, Group Product Manager Filter Systems for
Schroeder Industries. “Either form of water is harmful to both the fluid and the hydraulic system itself. Free water needs to be avoided and removed if present. The level of dissolved water needs to be kept as low as possible/ Always follow fluid supplier guidelines to avoid cooler fluid, e.g. in the reservoir, to shed fee water due to the lower ability to hold dissolved water at lower fluid temperature.”

In order to remove water, different methods are available. “However, there are both advantages and disadvantages to all methods that must be considered,” Zoller said.

sch-gravity-separation
Example of gravity separation setup.

Gravity separation
Zoller said that because water generally has a higher specific gravity than hydraulic fluid (exceptions do exist e.g. HFD-R), it tends to settle at the bottom of the reservoir when given sufficient resident time in a still environment.

“In basic systems, opening the drain valve and allowing the water to drain off may be sufficient. Increasing the fluid’s temperature and employing a cone-shaped separating tank improve the effectiveness of gravity separation,” he said.

Advantage: Simple device, low cost of water removal.

Disadvantage: Only free water removed, high fluid viscosity /oxidation by-products and polar additives and impurities inhibit the effective separation of oil and water, some oils are designed to hold water in suspension rather than to allow it to separate out, takes time, need of usually two tanks and therefore double the space and oil, no gas removal (degassing).

sch-polymergraphic
Example of super absorbent polymer (SAP).

Water absorbing elements
Super Absorbent polymer (SAP)
Conversion from free water to high viscosity gel with cross-linked polymer particles with integrated sodium ions. Osmotic pressure sucks ambient water into the polymer particles.

“Water absorption is limited by elastic memory forces of the polymer particles. The absorbed water cannot be taken out again by increasing pressure. The super absorber is not soluble in mineral oils and synthetic esters applications. A layered structure of the element prevents transfer of the polymer to the hydraulic system.”

Advantage: Can be used in standard filter housings, monitoring via differential pressure, water is not released even if pressure increases.

Disadvantage: Only free and some of the emulsified water removed, high element costs in applications with continuous water ingression, no gas removal (degassing).

Cellulose filter
Advantage: Removes some dissolved water, simple installation (like bypass filter).
Disadvantage: Limited capability for water removal per element, high element costs in applications with continuous water ingression, water is released when pressure or temperature increases, high stress on oil if continuous cooling and heating is applied, no gas removal (degassing).

sch-housingwithcoalescingelements
Example of a housing with coalescing elements from NYDAC/Schroeder Industries.

Coalescing elements
“Free water settles on the fibers of the coalescing element,” Zoller explained. “Droplets are transported deeper into the coalescing element by the fluid flow. Smaller drops unite to form larger ones at the fiber nodes during this process. Large water droplets are separated by gravity or with a special separation element/layer. Water is collected on the bottom of the housing (for phosphate esters on top) and it can be discharged by opening a valve.”

Advantage: High Dewatering Rates for high water contents (free water), suitable for hydraulic- and lubricating oils and diesel fuels, removes also particles in one element, high flow rates possible up to 2,000 gpm for diesel.

Disadvantage: Only free and emulsified water remove, no gas removal (degassing).

sch-centrifuge
Example of a centrifuge system.

Centrifuge
“By spinning the fluid, the difference in specific gravity between the fluid and the water is magnified. Centrifugal separators remove free water faster than gravity separators. They also remove some emulsified water depending upon the relative strength of the emulsion vs. the centrifugal force of the separator. They are a good option for continuous decontamination of fluids with good demulsibility (water separating characteristics)”, Zoller said.

Advantage: High Dewatering Rates for high water contents (free water), removes larger particles due to gravity.

Disadvantage: Only free and some of the emulsified water removed, has to be adapted to viscosity range, oil viscosities of <30 cSt for good results, oil usually heated to above 90° C (could cause premature fluid aging), no gas removal (degassing).

sch-positivepressuredehydrator
Example of a positive pressure dehydrator from HYDAC/Schroeder Industries.

Positive pressure dehydrators
“Positive pressure systems blow air through the operating fluid in a reaction chamber,” said Zoller. “Drying the air is achieved by increasing the temperature of the ambient air in a side channel blower and by getting it into contact with warmer oil. The air is introduced into the reaction chamber by a blower. The dry air takes up the water from the oil and is pushed out of the reaction chamber by the incoming air. The operating fluid is cycled through the reaction chamber by a system of two pumps.”

Advantage: Higher dewatering rates for free water compared to vacuum purifiers due to higher air flow rates, removes free and dissolved water, no expensive vacuum pump to service or replace.

Disadvantage: Less effective at high ambient humidity, less effective at high water contents compared to centrifugal or coalescing systems, no gas removal (degassing).

Microsoft Word - Schroeder FAQ remove water from hydraulic fluid
Example of a Vacuum dehydrator from HYDAC/Schroeder Industries).

Vacuum dehydrators
In vacuum based systems, a vacuum is created in a vacuum chamber by means of a vacuum pump. With the vacuum, ambient air is sucked into the vacuum chamber. The vacuum expands the ambient air and proportionately reduces the relative humidity of the air. The oil is distributing within the vacuum chamber over a large surface area, resulting in a large and thin fluid film.

“Due to the temperature increase when coming into contact with the warmer oil, the air is further dried and takes up the water from the oil. The humid air is evacuated via the vacuum pump. Depending on the applied vacuum and oil temperature, the water is evaporated (mass transfer) or boiled out (flash distillation) from the oil.”

Advantage: Removes water to very low levels even under high ambient humidity, suitable even for systems requiring lowest target levels of moisture, removes free and dissolved water, removes free and dissolved air (degassing – reduces air content in oil and therefore oxidation processes), works at relatively low oil temperature (between 40 to 60°C) that does not cause damage to the base oil or additives, will also remove other high vapor pressure contaminants like refrigerants, solvents and fuels (might require Explosion Proof unit), the dewatering requires no replacement elements.

Disadvantage: Less effective at high water contents (free water) compared to centrifugal or coalescing systems, higher initial cost and maintenance required.

Comparison of water removal methods:

table1

Notes:
1. Absorbing Elements do have a micron rating as well that is relatively high for certain manufacturers (e.g. 40 microns), but the main purpose is for water removal. Ideally, absorbing elements should be used in conjunction with particulate elements (staged filtration)
2. Some Coalescing Elements include a particulate filter portion (plea) for protection of the hydrophilic material. In order to prolong the coalescing element life time, a particulate filter can be added upstream.
3. The Centrifuge can remove some of the larger particulates as well

Conclusion
Water contamination is a continual issue. How to find the best way to eliminate or at least reduce the risk to a workable solution, truly depends on your type of system and the fluids passing through it. Rather than trial and error, he suggests that consulting an expert in the area is always the best first move to take.

By Joyce Laird

Filed Under: Featured, Fluids

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Fluid Power World Digital Editions

Fluid Power World Digital Edition

Browse the most current issue of Fluid Power World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading design engineering magazine today.

Fluid Power Design Guides

fluid
“sact
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Fluid Power Professionals.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

Sealing and Contamination Tips

Fluid Power World Digital Network

  • Fluid Power World
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Pneumatic Tips
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Leadership in Engineering

Sealing & Contamination Control

  • Subscribe to Fluid Power World
  • Videos
  • Advertise with us
  • About us

Copyright © 2026 · WTWH Media, LLC · Privacy Policy