• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sealing & Contamination Control Tips

Fluid Power Sealing and Contamination Control Information and Resources

  • News
  • Contamination Control
  • Filtration
  • Seals
  • Fluids
  • Design Guides
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Featured / Alternatives to O-rings for static sealing

Alternatives to O-rings for static sealing

January 7, 2021 By Ken Korane

Share

In our recent story, “Basics of static sealing,” Thomas Braun and Christoph Meissner with the Prädifa Technology Div. of Parker Hannifin’s Engineered Materials Group discussed the fundamentals of O-rings and back-up rings. And while rubber O-rings are probably the most common type of static seal, they indicated there are numerous other options design engineers should also consider.

energy-grid-tie-smart-technology-cooling-modularity-monitoring-parker-hannifin-34-638Extruded and cut seal profiles. One alternative to O-rings are extruded and cut seal profiles. In some sealing applications twisting of O-rings can cause problems, said Meissner. This may stem from improper assembly or due to pressure effects and minor relative movements in the sealing area. Partial twisting may lead to a short-term reduction of the material’s cross section and potential leaks. In the long run the seal itself may be damaged and completely fail.

Special profiles with an angular cross section at the bottom of the groove help avoid such problems, he explained. This effectively prevents twisting of the seal during assembly or in use. Due to the solid cross section, extrusion resistance against high pressures is also somewhat higher than that of O-rings. However, the design should be carefully calculated by experts to avoid leakage and damage, for instance by excessive filling of the groove.

Such seals are suited for a range of applications, including axial flange seals and radially acting static seals. Typical pressure range is to 200 bar and temperatures from -40° to 200° C. They are easy to install, may fit standard O-ring grooves, and come in various materials, said Meissner.

Rubber substitutes. O-rings are often made of rubber elastomers. But they also come in thermoplastic polyurethanes and take advantage of superior mechanical strength characteristics. They are often used whenever special robustness is required, said Braun. “Such O-rings are suitable for loading with far higher system pressure. Depending on the product design, TPU O-rings can be installed in grooves for classic O-rings, according to their cross section. As a result pressures up to 600 bar can be managed. Additional back-up O-rings can be omitted in this case so that groove dimensions can be minimized.”

Parker’s OV Series flange seal

Polyurethane O-rings exhibit excellent compression set and high wear resistance. They are insensitive to pressure peaks, offer high extrusion resistance, and have high abrasive-wear resistance against pressure-induced micro-motion. Various TPU materials are available which differ in terms of media resistance and permissible temperature range to successfully cover most application profiles.

Flange seals. Flange connections such as Parker’s OV Series provide axial sealing against front faces. “In this case, system pressure applied to the inner diameter of the flange seal activates the sealing element, in addition to the initial preloading after assembly. The non-pressurized side of the sealing element supports itself against the groove length in the radial direction,” said Braun.

The design of the seal’s cross section and corresponding grooves ensures ease of assembly, eliminates the risk of twisting and offers high extrusion resistance. “Due to the preloading towards the groove’s flank even overhead installations are easy to perform. For applications that may have to withstand vacuums at the end diameter, a groove that is closed towards the inside is recommended,” he said.

While classic flange seals are made of rubber elastomers, TPU materials with their specific advantages can manage pressure peaks up to 600 bar. “Special TPU materials enable uses with non-polar pressure fluids such as mineral oils as well as with biodegradable fluids. TPU materials for use with extremely low temperatures are available as well,” said Braun.

Static radial seal. Hydraulic actuators typically have a head seal between the cylinder cap and tube. This static sealing element has a radial sealing effect and, due to its elastic properties, can even compensate for potential flexing of the cylinder under system pressure. Conventional sealing configurations used to feature an O-ring/back-up ring. Today, however, a single head seal typically takes the place of this arrangement, said Braun.

Parker developed the HS seal profile as a viable alternative to O-ring/back-up ring combinations for static seal applications at pressures to 600 bar. The robust symmetrical seal geometry and extrusion-resistant polyurethane compounds simplify installation and enhance sealing in pulsation pressure conditions.

Compared to conventional set-ups, the HS offers easier installation, no twisting, and much higher extrusion resistance. It is suitable for standard O-ring grooves with back-up rings. In addition to use in hydraulic cylinders, they are found in hydraulic valves, machine tools and injection molding machines, and in other radial, static applications operating at high pressures.

Axial face seals come in customer-specific configurations.

Axial face seals. Axial face seals are customer-specific molded shape seals for hydraulic pumps and motors. “Accordingly, there’s a wide variety of variants available in the market place,” said Meissner. “The seals are produced from rubber such as NBR, HNBR or FKM and typically complemented by a back-up ring made from reinforced plastic.

“However, there are also polyurethane variants that do not require a back-up ring, which may provide many advantages for pump and motor assembly. Special high-grade polyurethane materials not only meet the demand for long life at high pressures up to 250 or even 300 bar, but also deliver the corresponding temperature resistance and wide chemical resistance.” And they’re molded with high precision to match tight manufacturing tolerances. As a result they support simplifications in design, logistics and assembly up to and including fully automated processes.

These seals are designed for challenging groove requirements.

Press-in-place seals. These static axial seals handle intricate and challenging groove geometries. “Press-in place, ‘PIP’ seals, are particularly well suited for complex flange sealing requirements,” said Braun, because the seal cross section can be adapted to the application and available groove: narrow and deep as well as broad and shallow groove geometries are possible.

“These customized flange seals are often used when standardized O-rings or X-rings are not achievable, due to the requirements relating to the height-width ratio of the groove,” he said. And no expansion is required during assembly. “Most PIP seals features small beads on the circumference of the seal geometry. These beads will then retain the sealing element in the groove and, thus, also enable overhead installation.”

Designs come in shapes ranging from circular versions to variants featuring multiple loops, and multiple seals such as screw seals and secondary seals may be integrated in one component — enabling several fluid channels to be sealed with one element.

When installing large PIP seals attention must be paid to uniform stress distribution in the circumferential direction, added Braun. In this case the installation is performed consecutively from several points of the circumference. They’re available in a wide range of rubber elastomers, silicones, and thermoplastic elastomers.

Composite sealing plates. Composite sealing plates — Parker terms them Gask-O-Seals — are among the most complex static sealing elements, said Braun. Their functional principle corresponds to that of an axial face seal and allows for highly customized designs. Unlike sealing elements using pure elastomer materials, the composite sealing elements have a rigid carrier element of metal or hard plastic. The elastomer element attaches to the carrier element by chemical bonding, by a positive locking connection, or both. This makes it possible to seal several flange areas with a single sealing element, as well as separate various media — such as oils, coolants, fuels and gases.

Composite sealing plates have an elastomer seal mated to a rigid carrier element.

They are designed with specific elastomer profiles integrated in or on the sealing plate. Among the advantages, the seal and groove are engineered as a single element, no seal groove is required on the flange, and compression of the sealing lip is precisely defined.

After installation, the sealing lip is protected from external influences and from internal, mechanical overloading. They offer easy and straightforward assembly and high operating reliability. And because the sealing plate is visible from the outside, it can be readily checked.

Gask-O-Seals composite sealing elements are particularly suited for difficult assembly scenarios. For example, a single rigid and easy-to-handle component may be used for sealing several areas in underwater, oil and gas assembly applications. Composite sealing plates are available in various versions, depending on the specific elastomeric element and carrier component. They are recommended for use as quasi-static sealing elements in flange areas, with pressure capability to about 60 bar and temperatures typically from -50° to 200° C.

Parker Hannifin
www.parker.com

Filed Under: Featured, News, Seals Tagged With: parker, parkerhannifin

Primary Sidebar

Fluid Power World Digital Editions

Fluid Power World Digital Edition

Browse the most current issue of Fluid Power World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading design engineering magazine today.

Fluid Power Design Guides

fluid
“sact
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Fluid Power Professionals.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Recent Comments

  • Are clogged hydraulic filters better? | Sealing & Contamination Control Tips on What types of hydraulic filters are available?

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Contamination Control
  • Featured
  • Filtration
  • Fluids
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • News
  • Products
  • Seals
  • tanks and reservois
  • Testing Equipment
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

Sealing and Contamination Tips

Fluid Power World Digital Network

  • Fluid Power World
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Pneumatic Tips
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Leadership in Engineering

Sealing & Contamination Control

  • Subscribe to Fluid Power World
  • Videos
  • Advertise with us
  • About us

Copyright © 2026 · WTWH Media, LLC · Privacy Policy